This is such a great post. Thank you!

Thank you! I'm so delighted that someone actually read through the whole thing--it came out much longer than planned!

Ooooh boy. Race in pop culture can be a tricky topic to tackle and I commend you for tackling it eloquently and quite well.

I do want to bring up something though...I won't quote too much of your post (otherwise I'll be here all day), but I will mention a certain part because that's what I'm ultimately getting to...

It is interesting that as series 2 has further developed both female characters, it’s broken the mold far more in regards to Gwen. Recent episodes have emphasized her beauty, her role as a love interest, and brought her into a more central place in the narrative (albeit one which emphasizes the function she fulfills for Arthur)—all of which undo earlier problems specific to black women in her treatment.

But while Morgana’s purely decorative role has lessened and she’s gotten a second chance to sword-fight, her white female fragility has been very much emphasized (and the white gowns just keep coming—see the promos for 2.05). This is the opposite of what I expected from a character developing her magical ability and growing into a potential antagonist. It remains to be seen what they’ll do with her next, but the show hasn’t shown any signs of stopping using the woman as contrasts to each other.

I think with regard to Gwen and Morgana, it's not so much a race issue as it is a class issue in medieval society...or at least the writers interpretation of medieval society...and the classical Arthurian legend. I'm not trying to negate, ignore, or disregard the issue of race when I say this because there are race issues to be confronted (Tom and the Druid in 2.03 both died, both were black) but when it comes to Gwen and Morgana it's the differences in their stations that determine their treatment by other characters and by the writers.

I think it's impossible to ignore the largest factor at play here which is the fact that Gwen, the future Queen of Camelot, is of colour and the future villain, Morgana, is white. The fact that Gwen has servant hands and does manual labour is due to her being a servant and Morgana is seen as beautiful and is pampered by all is because she is a noblewoman. The fact that the show cast a white woman to play the noble and a black woman to play a servant is important, yes, but so is the fact that the woman on colour will be the Queen.

As for portraying Gwen as whiter than she is through lighting and wardrobe...I can honestly say I don't see it. The kiss between her and Arthur in the sunlight I saw more as an opportunity to contrast with the kiss with Lancelot in the dark in 2.04. It was a metaphor for their relationship, I suppose. Am I just giving in to wishful thinking? I do think that for all their faults (and the writers do have them) the writers are doing an admirable job in portraying a smart, strong, beautiful woman of colour. We even see wardrobe taking her out of the drab clothes of last season and into prettier gowns this season...complete with flowers in her hair and everything.

With regard to more concern for Gwen in dangerous situations, I do think that has more to do with the class issues in medieval society (noblewoman vs. maid) than white vs. black. Again, this may just be me indulging in wishful thinking, but as I said I do see racial issues on Merlin....just not so rampant between Gwen and Morgana as in other cases.

Make sense or did I just ramble?

I agree completely with the contrast between the two kisses as the reason for the sunlight in Gwen's kiss with Arthur. I wrote about this in my episode summary!

I also agree about the general roles and importance of each character being attributed to class at this point. Uther has a personal relationship with Morgana, sees her as a daughter almost, and Gwen (much like Merlin in "The Poisoned Chalice") is just a servant to him. Similarly, we don't know who lived in the lower town in "The Labyrinth of Gedref" but Uther wanted it closed down because of class, saving the food rations for the soldiers and nobles.

I think a very meta-in-depth analysis of gender, race and class would be very interesting, not only in terms of the main cast, but also any secondary or guest characters.

In contrast, characters on the show are always protecting Morgana, even when she doesn’t need it—and even from herself...

Even the plot of episode 2.04 revolves around “missing white woman syndrome,” in which white women who are the victims of violent crimes receive extensive attention, while women of color in the same situation do not. Because the white girl is no longer missing, Uther sees no need to mount a rescue.

Surely this is simply reading something that isn't there...Isn't it utterly obvious that from a story pov Morgana is protected because of her class and status? Uther sees no reason to rescue Gwen because she's a servant, not his ward. He doesn't care for Gwen.

Putting any sort of racial interpretation on it is labouring the point too far. No one upon no one will read it any differently than the difference between the princess and the servant i.e. class.

Edited at 2009-10-19 06:55 am (UTC)

No one upon no one will read it any differently...

Please don't make erroneous generalisations on my behalf.

Pretty interesting. Thanx.

I'm not quite through the article yet, and it's interesting so far, but you got Morgana's name wrong. The actress who plays her is named Katie McGrath not Katie Bell.

Thank you! It is corrected. I have the feeling that Katie Bell is someone I went to kindergarten with...

Excellent, thoughtful and thought-provoking post, well done.

Thank you, very much. And thanks for your contributions here as well.

Whoa, you've said a mouthful here. Really eloquent and thoughtful piece. It's so important to check ourselves in discussions on race and gender because even if we're well-intentioned, when we fail to examine how whiteness can affect the narrative as well as non-whiteness, that's just colluding in the othering of PoCs. And does a disservice to everyone, because the treatment of white women in media has as much to do with their fragile whiteness as it does to do with their fragile femininity; it hampers their agency and holds them back just as much.

So far we’ve seen Morgana speak up or take action on behalf of herself—she rightly calls out Arthur’s sexism when he tries to deny that she helped save his life—or others with which she feels a strong personal bond (Mordred, Merlin, and Gwen (in 2.04)). That’s great. That makes her a good friend and decent human being. That does not make her an activist.

What I find interesting about this point is that Katie McGrath herself knows this. In her recent GeekSyndicate interview, she made a point of mentioning how when Morgana exerts moral influence over people (in this case she was talking about Arthur), she does it in a more manipulative way; she's often doing it to suit her own ends. Whereas when Gwen does it, and again Katie was talking about Arthur in this case, she does it with the greater political goal and general principles in mind. So yeah, it's definitely interesting that it's deliberate, if not on the writers' part then certainly in Katie's performance/acting decisions, but fandom still doesn't pick up on it, in large part.

(I kind of hate that Morgana's being painted as selfish and unstable whenever she asserts her power. The court scene in 2x04, where she fails to get through to Uther and then tries Arthur and then Gaius of all people leads her out of the room slightly hysterical, was a particular low point. I want so much more for her; she has real power but never gets to use it. I'm still hoping that she'll start standing up for magic users the way Merlin never really does. It seems like something she would do, but the show seems to be hinting that she's Not To Be Trusted. Meh.)

I appreciate how you layer dimensions of race, gender, and class when it comes to Morgana and Gwen. It's hard to compare Gwen's and Morgana's treatment on the show (though it's problematic for both of them), from a purely feminist perspective. White women and WoCs might have similar feminist struggles, but they have totally different starting points. Which is why I have trouble with the whole idea that Gwen's being 'reduced' or 'downgraded' to love interest in series 2. Argh, I have such complicated feelings about that. I'm looking forward to your next essay for perhaps that very reason. XD

Edited at 2009-10-19 03:46 pm (UTC)

Thank you so much. It is SO gratifying to see someone get what I'm saying here.

I find it tricky to talk about whiteness, because it's hard to strike the balance between how a character like Morgana is confined by her whiteness and yet also benefits from its privilege. But as you point out, we absolutely need to, because ignoring it only leads to blind spots about both these areas.

I'm really glad to hear that Katie McGrath's has talked about her character's tendency toward manipulation and self-interest--it makes me all the more interested in how she'll play these aspects in the future. She's totally right; Gwen seems to have a nascent sense of politics, unlike Morgana's world of intensely personal agendas, and it's interesting to hear how conscious that is. Admittedly the flaws add some interest to her character, but the gap between how the show presents her and how many in fandom read her really bothers me.

I also hate the selfishness and instability that you remark on. It's particularly striking, because this is the point where I expected Morgana to become more powerful and effective, and the knowledge of her powers seems to be having the opposite effect...

And amen to your point about the difficulty of comparing Gwen & Morgana from a one-lens feminist perspective! And the whole bit about Gwen being "downgraded" to love interest... let's face it, for much of season 1 Gwen was a glorified extra. Her position has improved, though there's a lot of room for improvement...

(Deleted comment)
Evidence such as all of the non-white/non-middle class feminists that have and do exist? Have you really never come across any?

(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
Thanks for a really interesting article.

I think it's quite hard to judge as we have absolutely no idea what the show would be like if actors of different ethnic origins had been cast, though I definitely agree that they are using Katie McGrath's skin tone to make Morgana seem more fragile. I agree with many of your points, but with that one in particular.
Sexism is a definite problem in Merlin, especially with Morgana in the fact that in most episodes she just sits there and looks pretty. Even though it's obvious that she has a certain amount of intelligence she doesn't seem able to do many things for herself (other than in the Morgana-centric episodes, when even then she is often aided by others). Obviously there are many other problems with sexism in the show, but I'd just be repeating even more of what you've already said.

I do disagree with your judgments over Uther's dealings with Morgana; even if Morgana was black and Gwen white, Uther would have reacted in the same way as Morgana has been his daughter for the last decade (give or take) and Gwen's her servant, a woman with whom he does not have any kind of a relationship.

Thanks for posting. Glad to hear that you agree with some of my points!

As I've tried to clarify above in comments, I don't think Uther is motivated by race when he decides not to rescue Gwen; within the show, the context is class & his relationships with the characters. (I do think he has some relationship, though not a positive one, with Gwen; at this point he's killed her father and almost killed her, so it's not as if he's never noticed her. He just thinks she's unworthy of normal human concern.)

But because of the races of the people involved, the plot enacts, or provides a visual acting-out, of a really common real-life instance of racism. So the message is there, even though it's not motivating the characters in this instance.

(Deleted comment)
Very glad you're enjoying!

I like your point about each character's journey bringing them to a very different place, and I very much hope you're right about Morgana. I currently feel I have no idea what they're going to do with Morgana--there are so many possibilities. As of today, I wouldn't mind so much if she becomes villainous as long as she becomes a force to be reckoned with.

And I love your elaboration of my point about Gwen's principals and politics; yes, she does have the qualities of a good queen, and your reading of that journey is so much more appealing than seeing her only as Arthur's pick. We'll see which the writers choose to emphasize...

Believe me, I'm not arguing against you--indeed, it's distressing how accurate your assessment feels to me here. But you have made me wonder about some things that I'd like to share with you:

The darkness of Merlin versus Arther's blond beauty. It's interesting that this fits the 'immigrant' stereotype, because it's also a very common trope of media and literature--the quirky looking dark one (also often shorter), versus the conventionally gorgeous blond(e). Starskey and Hutch leaps instantly to mind, as does Emergency! and I'm sure I could think of several others. Those shows are from the 1970s, but I've read it in almost every romance novel I've ever picked up, or really in any type of literature that includes a close relationship. For the 2000s, Firefly had the contrasts of the white, goofily friendly Wash with his black, serious and ferocious wife, and even the blond Mal with his love interest the dark, mysterious and exotic Inara. (Perhaps Joss Whedon isn't the best example, since he's kind of been RaceFailing all over the place since the early 90s.) But there's also precocious, blonde and blue-eyed Carter of SG-1 paired with the dark-haired O'Neill, and of course John's barely veiled interest in Teyla in Stargate: Atlantis. John's colouring is dark, but he's not quite as dark as Teyla. (Of course, for us slashers, Rodney serves as the quirky, shorter love interest, though in this case his colouring is lighter.)

So, I personally think that it could be that what's at work here with Arther and Merlin is reusing a trope without thinking of the greater consequences. Arther, who is the noble and future king, must be the golden child, whereas his loyal companion, a misfit on many levels, is darker and less conventionally handsome. That doesn't obviate the affect; if anything, it only proves how little thought is put into what the audience will take away.

I'm also wondering if Gwen isn't cast as the (plucky), capable one because she's black. There's no way the actress could be the noblewoman for the same reason that the actor cast as Merlin couldn't instead have been cast as the future king (God forbid), but since she's a minority, I think there's a possibility that the writers and producers are doing the equivalent of saying, 'look!--we're not racist! See how cool she is?' But the affect is, of course, to actually underline how racist they're being.

I'm sure that if the producers were confronted with this they'd say that they're in a no-win situation, and of course they are, so long as they stay within the boundaries they're used to and, sadly, most people expect.

Yes, I see that you're elaborating on some of my thoughts with your own, which is great. I do think what's happening here is exactly what you describe--the producers working with their own preconceptions and no awareness of the messages that they unconsciously send.

And while I'm not familiar with all of your examples, I agree that the the dark/light contrast is a very common trope, especially for characters of the same sex. (It's particularly common in lesbian movies, for instance, where the producers can't rely on sex to visually distinguish their leads.)

I do want to clarify that when I referred to Merlin as an immigrant, I meant that in the show he's literally an immigrant from another kingdom (albeit in a world with a much looser definition of borders than our own). The fact that Merlin comes from outside Camelot has repeatedly been a plot point, and is key to his role as a stand-in for the audience (so, for instance, he needs to be told who Cornelius Sigan was along with us).

But at the same time, I do think there's a way that Merlin codes as "less white" than Arthur--as an immigrant, as a working-class man, as a closeted magic-user. (Smarter people than I have talked about the ways people who are poorer become "blacker" and "more female"--in other worlds, more subject to the penalties of having those subject positions.) The interesting thing about the show is that they've generally valorized Merlin's end of these differences, and made him the lead.

And in light of that, it's interesting that Merlin has had so much less screen-time recently. I sometimes wonder if the show were called "Arthur" if the lead would ever take a backseat, but it may just be bad writing--the writers seem to be having a particularly bad time handling more than one plot point per episode this season.

(Deleted comment)
Thank you for this. It's so rare for people to talk about race in regard to a white character, which is understandable to a certain extent, but only feeds the notion that race and ethnicity are these exotic things setting POC apart.

I particularly liked your observations about Morgana falling into the trope of "delicate white woman" and feel that her supposed sickly-ness does a lot to reinforce this, along with her "hysterical" behaviour. I would like to hope that her pallour were a deliberate metaphor for Morgana fading away as she is deliberately disempowered by men who seek to keep knowledge of her own magic from her, but it seems more like she's being portrayed as weak, delicate, and unhealthy.

It would be really nice if TPTB could stop trying to deliberately contrast Morgana and Gwen. Apart from the fact that pitting the two female leads against each other is old and tired anyway, the sexy, earthy WOC/aloof, fragile ice queen dichotomy has far too much fail potential.

Thanks for this post! :) Lots to chew over, and I'm so, so glad that you talked about the limitations of white womanhood as well, because that definitely needs to be examined.

Also, friending you, because I like essays that make me think!

Thank you so much! I'm glad to hear that other people think there's a need for these kinds of examinations; it's very validating.

And thank you for the friending! I will return the favor and try to keep up the thought-provoking essays!

I read it all the way through, and there's definitely a lot of food for thought and a lot of things that I hadn't explicitly noticed before - eg. Morgana's outspokenness being more personally motivated and not generally motivated, yet being attributed as a general motivation rather than a personal one.

And I'm beginning to wonder if I've seen this in another fandom and just didn't recognise the pattern before.

Anyway, great post - thank you!

Like glass_icarus, I'm going to friend you for your future essays.

Hey, wow! Really glad to have made you think, especially about patterns you've seen before.

And the friending is mutual! Hope any future essays live up!

I don't have time to write up all my thoughts at the moment, but I do have to say how much I love you for noticing that Arthur is acting the wife in this show, what with him carrying the keys and all. In my head Morgana totally has them.

(I think the show has switched it deliberately both for plot purposes - the Mordred episode in particular - and because of an underlying message that Morgana isn't to be trusted, even though Uther explicitly says he trusts her. It's also a convenient excuse to shoehorn Arthur into plots where he really doesn't naturally fit.)

I'm curious about your thoughts on Aglain. My first reaction was a kind of low-burn anger after the death watch proved true, so I don't think I was entirely rational about him for a week or so. Now that I think on it, I wonder if there isn't a little bit of a trope inversion going on. Arthur perceives Aglain to be a threat to Morgana and has him killed, but we the audience know that Aglain was not only completely peaceful in his intentions but was also Morgana's best chance at becoming a sane person capable of controlling her powers. The disparity between what Arthur thinks and what the audience knows makes Aglain's death murder in our eyes (by default, I mean - it's very possible to fanwank Arthur's angle to get him out of that charge).

Is that a reversal of the "dangerous black man" trope? Or is there something I'm missing here? *scratches head* This is all complicated by the fact that Colin Salmon is 6'4" and has a deep voice - very much fitting the physical stereotype.

Oh, and this post? INSTA-FRIEND. ^_^

Hey, thanks! Glad to see someone else noticed. I think you raise an excellent point about plot purposes; it has struck me how much trouble the writers have shoehorning Arthur into plots that aren't All About Him. But I would also argue that a deeply-ingrained historical amnesia about women's lives--the fact that women have always worked, and often had plot-worthy duties--is at play. (A pet peeve of mine.)

Re Aglain, my first thought was: Shit. I agree that there's definitely some trope inversion going on (as there is in the following episode; Uther acting in accordance with the "missing white woman" phenomenon provides the rest of the cast a chance to show how important Gwen is), which is notable because it's another case of the show using race, consciously or not, to underline a plot point, despite the ostensibly race-blind world.

But my beef is that they could have had the same effects--Morgana isolation, trope inversion, and all--without actually killing Aglain. Some alternatives:

1) Morgana makes the heroic decision to give herself up to save the druids; Aglain (like the audience) appreciates the enormity of her sacrifice and promises they will meet again

2) Aglain and company use magic to escape but leave Morgana behind for fear of Uther (bonus angst points and trust issues for her, which might help her villain development)

3) Aglain and company use magic to escape and try to bring Morgana with them but Merlin prevents it (which would also kill the bond between Merlin & Morgana (another aim of the episode))

4) Aglain is captured alive because Uther wants to execute him publicly like he did Mordred's first mentor, but a) Morgana comes up with a mix of honesty and lies (maybe they saved her from the actual kidnappers) to exonerate him (this would probably have worked on Arthur, and given him another chance to try to quietly resist his dad), or b) helps him escape, probably with Merlin's help (it's not like they haven't recycled plot points before).

There are many other ways they could have removed Aglain from the scene that wouldn't have involved his death. Note 1 & 4 also improve Morgana's agency and moral development. And any of them could have incorporated Aglain prophesying that he & Morgana would meet again, but not for a very long time--or that they wouldn't meet again, or would be enemies in the future, or what have you. Morgana's a seer, for goodness's sake!

The fact that the way they chose to get rid of the black guy was killing him strikes me as problematic--and because all the other black men on this show have died, it suggests that the show-makes don't value the lives of those characters. (It certainly sends the unconscious message.)

I also thought the fact that Aglain didn't get much of a death scene, or a final heart-wrenching exchange with Morgana--he drops from an arrow while she's unconscious!--undermined some of the pathos of the loss.

(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
Can I just say thank you for this? So much? This whole post is just so lovely. And it acknowledges the intersectionality of these issues, which so many people are determined to deny.

I had so much trouble getting attached to Morgana at all. I liked the idea of her, and certainly didn't dislike her, but Gwen (and Mordred) were the only characters in the whole cast I'm truly attached to. And I think part of that is having had some exposure to fandom before encountering canon--they treat Morgana like this faultless feminist angel, and I wasn't really seeing it, and thus was having trouble connecting with her on the basis of the conflicting perceptions. Gwen barely seems to exist within fandom perception, so she was free to charm me from her first second on screen without any cognitive dissonance getting in the way.

I could barely begin to express my outrage and fury over Gaius lying, drugging and manipulating a vulnerable girl who trusted him being portrayed as 'taking care of her' and 'caring for her.' Because she just couldn't handle the truth, shall we protect the poor little wimmenz? Of course, after hearing him tell Nimueh that she had to make amends for granting her friend a favour--essentially trying to lay murder and genocide on her shoulders so he could pat himself on the back for his support of an vicious tyrant--I feel nauseous whenever he comes on screen.

Yes, you can! In these parts appreciation is always appreciated! I am also delighted to see others care about intersectionality, as I think it's actually become more and more important to these characters. (Or maybe just more and more obvious to me.)

I also like the idea of Morgana much better than what we've seen on screen, and I completely agree with you on the fanon/canon disconnect on her character. Morgana seems easy for many people to project their ideal female character traits onto, and I've always found this curious. I suspect her race has a lot to do with it--both in that many people drawn to female characters found it hard to identify with a black woman, and that Morgana was initially introduced as beautiful & glamourous enough to be fun to identify with. I don't think fandom's neglect of Gwen is all that benign, though it does leave her free for some of us to come to without preconceptions. (Plus, she is charming.)

And Gaius....oh, I'm not sure I have the stamina to express all my rage about Gaius. I can't stand his character, and the periodic attempts at warm and fuzzy moments with Merlin make me retch. His backstory as a turncoat and supporter of the magical genocide, his manipulation of Merlin and Morgana both, the drugging's all bad. Worse, I think, is that if a female character had done half of what he has, she would probably be a villain.

It really frustrates me, Morgana's portrayal. Because honestly, I feel like giving us a token powerful girl and then undermining her at every turn is more frustrating than giving us a weak female character. At least then I'm not hoping and expecting and rooting for her to get to do things and then getting kicked in the face. My interaction with fandom is usually fairly scarce (after some rather unpleasant experiences when I first started interacting online), but I remember being very frustrated with the dearth of Gwen icons while Morgana imagery abounded. I just didn't find her as interesting as I did Gwen.

Oh, I don't think fandom's neglect of Gwen is at all benign--rather frustrating, actually--I just meant to compare my perceptions of them. Frankly, I think with the vivid personality Angel Coulby brings to the scant time she's given, she would have charmed me regardless. Gwen is just lovely. I actually like Morgana's canon version better now that I have a fuller grasp of the character and her flaws, or rather I would if I thought the canon was going to deal with or acknowledge those flaws (and strengths) in a way that wouldn't reduce me to banging my head on my desk.

I haven't really read a fic about Gwen/Morgana that I'm entirely comfortable with. They never really deal with the class divide that is obviously there, friends or no, and Gwen--as aware of her own position in life as she is--can hardly be oblivious to. I feel like the whole episode where Morgana turns Gwen's tragedy into her own offense over a man long dead really drives home, unwittingly or no, her perspective on their status and situations. Racially problematic and also a very accurate reproduction of older views about servants--that they exist as extensions and belongings of the nobility, that they are important for how they affect their masters/mistresses. She's certainly better about it than Arthur, but to me it seems like she's unquestioning of that assumption of natural privilege, and it's hard to imagine Gwen truly being as blithe. I mean, maybe I'm being too sensitive, but it just leaves me uncomfortable.

Excellent post. Thank you.

the same dynamic took place in Britain’s South Asian and African colonies and I believe it is present in the UK today, often coded in terms of crime. Please tell me if I’m wrong.

You are very much correct as the overt lies of BNP politicians, amongst others, demonstrate.

Re: Here via metafandom

Hey, thanks for confirming. Though it is depressing to see just how common such lies are...

This was such an interesting and eloquent post, thank you! I'm totally guilty of ignoring whiteness as a racial issue, but I loved the points you made - especially about the "white woman's tears" phenomenon, which is definitely problematic, and something I agree the show was guilty of. (You also managed to incorporate the use of 'metaphorical' whiteness and blackness - lighting, costuming, Merlin vs Arthur, etc. - in a way that made sense to me and was relevant to the discussion; it's something I've seen overwhelm discussions about actual race elsewhere, but its inclusion in your post was very well done.)

Hey, thanks for the feedback! It is appreciated. I believe that those metaphorical uses of whiteness & blackness are important to note, but it's important that they don't overwhelm the discussion of how actual characters and people of color are treated.

I don't, at least currently, watch this show, but I am interested in it, and I am bookmarking this post for future chewing.

Thanks for the peeking! I do things like that all the time, so just wanted to say I appreciate you noting your possible future interest.

Again, with another really excellent post. I like the way you broke this down. I also skimmed the comments and saw that someone brought up the race vs. class issue, and I do think that there is so much that needs to be said about race in this series, separately from class, and that you (and others) are addressing this need.

I would not have thought to talk about Morgana's race (my own blind spot showing here), and I'm very glad that you did. It was very useful to reconsider from a racial perspective the problems with Morgana's characterization that were distressing me so much from a feminist perspective. They intersect in alarming ways. You are right about the 'weak white woman' stereotype doing no one any favours.

I've noticed some weird costuming things going on with Morgana, following on to what you said with her extreme pallor and the richly-hued dresses. The Morgana-centric episodes often have her in very bright red or green. She wore that Little Red Riding Hood/Scarlet Letter cloak in the one where she helped Mordred escape in season 1, and again when she wandered the forest to meet the druids in season 2. And she wore Poison Ivy/Shades of Envy green in the one where she was contemplating killing Uther, and again in the season 2 druid one, where she was all quiet and despairing in that very last scene with Merlin in her room. Some weird colour symbology going on there? I noticed because she kept wearing these bright, bright things only in the scenes where she was supposed to be sneaking around in the dark or the woods, being stealthy.

Maybe the colors only come out when she's being who she really is?

Thank you for this excellent and insightful post!

What a great post--thanks for sharing. I did read all of it, because you're right not to take whiteness as neutral and your interrogation of it is great. (Here via metafandom, btw.)

Hey, thanks! Hadn't seen the metafandom link at all, so it's much appreciated.


Log in